top of page
Search

Aetna & Optum Settle “Dummy Codes” Case for $8.4M: What Fiduciaries Should Learn.

Fiduciaries need the people, process, and technology to ensure plan oversight.
Fiduciaries need the people, process, and technology to ensure plan oversight.

After nearly a decade of litigation, Aetna Life Insurance Company and OptumHealth Care Solutions have agreed to pay $8.4 million to settle allegations that they concealed administrative fees inside claims using so-called “dummy codes.”

🚩 Allegations

Plaintiff Sandra Peters argued that Aetna and Optum:

  • Directed providers to submit claims with “Administrative Add-On Services.”

  • Masked Optum’s administrative fees as medical expenses, raising member cost-sharing.

  • Failed to disclose these hidden charges to plan members or sponsors, violating ERISA fiduciary duties.

🏛️ Litigation Timeline

  • 2019: Case dismissed by the district court.

  • 2021: Fourth Circuit revived claims, finding plausible evidence of disguised fees.

    (Peters v. Aetna Inc., No. 19-2085, Opinion PDF).

  • 2022: Supreme Court denied review.

  • 2025: Case settled ahead of trial.

“Neither Aetna nor Optum disclosed to members that they would be charged for Optum’s administrative fees, nor that such charges would increase the members’ cost-sharing obligations.”
  • $8.4M total: $4.6M from Aetna, $200k from Optum, $3.6M to attorneys’ fees.

  • Class: Over 250,000 members who paid cost-sharing on claims with “Administrative Add-On Services.”

  • Distribution: Pro-rata payments based on overcharges.

“Class Members are those who, during the Class Period, paid cost-sharing amounts on claims that included Administrative Add-On Services submitted by providers contracted through Optum.”

🔍 Broader Implications for Self-Funded Plans

  1. Transparency in Billing – Overhead can be hidden in coding, obscuring true medical costs.

  2. ERISA Fiduciary Duties – Courts reaffirm that insurers and vendors may both be fiduciaries when they impact plan assets.

  3. Vendor Oversight – Insurer–vendor relationships blur responsibilities; fiduciaries must demand clarity.

  4. Access to Data – Without full access to your claims and payment data, you cannot identify these hidden costs, conflicts, and fiduciary risks.

  5. Individual Action, Systemic Change – One participant’s complaint yielded relief for 250,000 people, showing the power of ERISA enforcement.

✅ The Fiduciary Takeaway

For self-funded sponsors, the message is clear:

  • Scrutinize claims for hidden charges.

  • Review vendor arrangements to uncover disguised costs.

  • Document oversight to prove prudent process.

At ClaimInformatics, we help fiduciaries shine a light on opaque billing practices and protect plan assets from disguised fees. Transparency isn’t optional — it’s your duty.

 
 
 
bottom of page